Financial Disputes & Decision Advisory

Financial facts. Defensible decisions.

Every consequential financial decision should rest on established fact — not assertion — and hold up when it is tested.

Three core services.
One defensible financial fact base.

Independent financial analysis and senior CFO/CRO judgement, scoped around the decision that counsel, investors or the board must make next.

01Financial Disputes

Financial Disputes & Litigation Support

Independent financial analysis and, where appropriate, party-adviser support under an agreed scope — establishing traceable facts, assumptions and evidence.

  • Rapid Case Assessment & quantum range
  • Financial model & quantum review — valuation, damages, earn-outs
  • Second opinions & report critique
  • Governance reconstruction (chronology & decision map)
Explore Financial Disputes
02Transaction Control

Transaction Control & Post-Deal Integrity

Operator-grade review of value, working capital, completion mechanics, leakage, close quality, controls and post-deal reporting.

  • Transaction-control review & red flags
  • SPA & completion-account disputes
  • Earn-out & W&I matters
  • Post-deal integrity & 100-day control plan
Explore Transaction Control
03Board Advisory

Board Advisory & Financial Governance

Independent CFO/CRO-level judgement when boards, investors or management need clarity on financial exposure, control and governance.

  • Board-level financial-control review
  • Liquidity, downside & covenant sensitivities
  • Governance risk map & recommendations
  • Independent board-level decision support
Explore Board Advisory
Counsel · Investors · Boards
01 Counsel

The dispute turns on financial proof.

Disputed quantum, completion accounts, earn-outs, W&I, shareholder disputes, damages or data gaps.

For Counsel
02 Investors

Transaction value or control is at risk.

Working capital, leakage, earn-outs, covenants, post-deal controls or disputed value drivers.

For Investors
03 Boards

A board-critical decision must withstand scrutiny.

Unreliable numbers, liquidity or capital pressure, audit scrutiny or blurred finance/risk accountability.

For Boards
HALD Advisory
Why HALD

HALD establishes the fact base, tests assumptions and documents the reasoning so decisions can be defended under scrutiny.

Boards, their advisers and counterparties are increasingly required to justify decisions to regulators, courts and shareholders.

  • Senior ownership. Every mandate is led by the principal from scope to findings.
  • Regulated-market fluency. Statutory board experience, DNB Fit & Proper credentials and 20+ unqualified audit cycles — attaching to former appointments, not to HALD Advisory.
  • Operator judgement. Finance, risk, capital, liquidity and governance experience applied to the decision at hand.
  • Evidence discipline. Conclusions are tied to the underlying evidence and structured for external challenge.
About the Principal

Aldwin Boers

Founder & Principal, HALD Advisory

Former statutory CFO/CRO with 25+ years in regulated financial services, including 12 years as CFO of ABN AMRO Clearing Bank. Formerly Wft-licensed and positively assessed by DNB for those appointments.

Former statutory appointments only. Not HALD client work. Not the regulatory status of HALD Advisory.

Selected matters
View Selected Matters

Dispute

Contested financial position

Type of supportExposure range / negotiation position.

Transaction

Post-acquisition control review

Type of supportPrioritised reporting and control plan.

Board

Liquidity under regulatory deadline

Type of supportRisk map and escalation priorities.

How HALD works

Connect Independence check Scope & secure intake Decision-ready findings

No privileged or highly confidential information is needed initially.

Optional structured review

Rapid Case Assessment

Focused. Fixed-fee. Decision-ready.

Scope, document set, deliverables, timetable and fee are agreed in writing.

Financial facts · Model logic · Exposure range · Decision options

Explore the Rapid Case Assessment